Academy for The Cultivation of The Natural Arts + Creativity House
Researching the traditions I+N Tradition and Tradition in all traditions

Education I+N Love     +     The Rainbow Programme
The Neith Network Library + Primordial Wisdom Re-Membered

1        2        3        4        5        6        7

All words and images within our websites are better appreciated within the context of Giorgio de Santillana's & Hertha von Dechend's Hamlet's Mill (Boston, David R. Godine, 1977; especially pp. 49, 140, 268-71, 310-11 & 323) - "Way back in time, before writing was even invented, it was measures and counting that provided the armature, the frame on which the rich texture of real myth was to grow."

Thou hast arranged all things by measure and number and weight.”

Wisdom 11:20        

Summer Solstice Sunset at Hagar Qim

Malta's Living Heritage

The lunar and solar alignments of Malta's prehistoric temples deserve much more attention than they have so far received (cf. R.I.L.K.O. Journal, no. 60, pp.16-24).

The following notes are provisional and preliminary:

DAVID H. TRUMP's attractively arranged Malta: Prehistory and Temples (Midsea Books, 2002; main photography, artwork and maps by Daniel Cilia; 320 pages), in which the photograph printed in the lower left-hand corner of page 76 displays as on the right those features which in reality appear on the left, and vice versa, also disappointingly fails to include the excellent photograph Daniel Cilia took at the Summer Solstice on 21 June, 1999, of the Sun, viewed through the entrance doorway to the High Chapel at Ħaġar Qim, setting exactly behind the corresponding portion of the hill-top on the distant horizon. A rare old photo on pp. 146-7 includes in front of the doorway of the high chapel at the junction of both pages blocks still forming a V-groove that permitted observation of winter solstice sun-rise in the south-east through a window in the front wall (as recent photos show, this groove has now been filled with concrete!).

Our earlier photograph of that same phenomenon, exhibited above, was taken by Qrendi-born Joseph S.Ellul of Zurrieq on 21 June 1988. The plan displayed below is of the neighbouring Mnajdra site; it was prepared by Professor Vere Gordon Childe, who visited both of these prehistoric complexes before World-War II, when Joseph was still living with his parents in Qrendi and his father, Carmel, previously Sir Themistocles Zammit's foreman-of-works at Tarxien, was then working as a guide at both Mnajdra and Ħaġar Qim, which are situated in the Parish of Qrendi, by the sea-side, and quite close to the war-time Qrendi air-strip, where a battery-chicken fattoria now stands.

Professor Trump, who retired from teaching in 1997, is best known as the author of several academic and popular books with an archæological focus, including A Dictionary of Archæology (London: Book Club Associates, 1973), and Malta - An Archæological Guide (Valletta: Progress Press, 2nd edition, 1990; revised edition 2000). All his proposed dates for the construction of Malta's and Gozo's prehistoric buildings are probably incorrect. They differ markedly both from those earlier suggested by either Zammit or Evans and from those more recently indicated by Renfrew and others, several of whose notably contrasting chronologies will, one suspects, also fall into oblivion soon enough.

       

Two years ago, while visiting the remains of the prehistoric temple at Tal Qadi between Salina Bay and Burmarrad, I saw for myself how widely Trump's specification of their geographical location (in section 7 of the Tunbridge Wells based Institute for Cultural Research 1988 expanded edition of Rowland Parker and Michæl Rubinstein's Malta's Ancient Temples and Ruts, p.19, here reproduced) diverges from the truth.

His new book, perpetuating the myth that those responsible for the design and construction of Malta's prehistoric monuments kept no written records, omits much that deserved to be said, and he shows little or no appreciation of the importantly different characteristics of different kinds of Maltese stone. Doctor Trump is a scholar and a gentleman. He writes pleasantly and urbanely. He clearly loves the Maltese islands and their inhabitants, and he has visited for himself the many sites his words illumine. If he sometimes places them in a false light, as is, indeed, the case, Professor John D. Evans, whose The Prehistoric Antiquities of the Maltese Islands (University of London, Athlone Press, 1971) has retained its own importance, must take some of the blame.

The caption beneath the illustration on the left at the foot of page 142 of Malta: Prehistory and Temples states that "the seaward wall… has been seriously eroded by the weather." Although this southern wall at ĦaÄ¡ar Qim, which is still standing, is, indeed, made of massive and now severely eroded stones, they are of the sort that are known as "non-eroding globigerina limestone", because, when left in isolation, they never erode. It is a well known fact that stones of this type erode only when in immediate contact with what are called "eroding stones" - and, even then, their rate of erosion is very much less than is that of eroding stones.

From this natural, known and intrinsic characteristic of Maltese stone of this sort, it follows, firstly, that this southern and now "seaward" wall has not eroded at all during the five thousand years or more that have elapsed since a tidal-wave from the West destroyed most of the other walls at Ħaġar Qim and threw down those eroding stones which had previously beeen in direct contact with that part of the southern wall which is still standing and, secondly, that at the time when that tidal-wave occurred, this southern wall had already been standing for some 4,800 years, as Joseph S. Ellul, whose father, Carmel, for many years Sir Temi Zammit's foreman-of-works and close collaborator, has very clearly and patiently already explained more than once.

Moreover, since the oldest man-made constructions at Ħaġar Qim predate the construction of that particular wall by another 2,000 years, Professor Vere Gordon Childe was not mistaken in claiming that Ħaġar Qim dates back 12,000 years, and Mr. Ellul has recently and cogently summarised several features of the evidence which are, all too often, overlooked (see below).

When the correct dates for their original construction are ascertained, Stonehenge, the Great Pyramid and the mind-boggling stone platform at Baalbek may still prove to be much more ancient than any of the prehistoric remains on the Maltese islands, Għar Dalam excepted. Meanwhile, David Trump's Malta - Prehistory and Temples, with its abundance of excellent photographs by Daniel Cilia, is among the best available books of its kind and, as a first point of reference for casual visitors and serious students alike, clearly deserves the ready welcome that many readers have already accorded it.

The attractive illustrations showing how the temples were built are, however, quite impractical, being inspired more by modern building methods and a romantic imagination rather than by archæological evidence; they are, indeed, good examples of what George Pullicino has rightly called '"incredible detail". From a literary standpoint, Doctor Trump's text is, perhaps, "impeccably written"; factually, however, I prefer David Trump's own more realistic assessment of our current situation:

"The temples of Malta are surely one of the wonders of the prehistoric world, and one cannot expect to understand wonders fully." (From his Foreword to Part One of the 1988 edition of Malta's Ancient Temples and Ruts.)

Some relevant images:

One        Two        Three        Four        Five        Six        Seven

A        B        C        D        E        F        G

11        22        33        44        55        66        77

I        II        III        IV        V        VI        VII

Image 33 above is a photograph of a prehistoric statuette belonging to a second set of seven, found at ĦaÄ¡ar Qim. When originally displayed in the National Museum of Archæology in Valletta, it was accompanied by a rectangular white-card label, inscribed by Professor Doctor Sir Themistocles Zammit: "Headless statuette of globigerina limestone representing a standing naked figure of male sex. It has been cut from a flat block. On the upper surface there is a centrally placed hole, perhaps of modern workmanship."

                      
Undersea photographs © Shaun Arrigo.

  • 2227-8. ANTHONY BONANNO, Malta - An Archæological Paradise, new edition (Valletta, 1997); An Illustrated Guide to Prehistoric Gozo, 2nd revised edition (Rabat, Gozo: Gaulitana, 2002). In an article in The Malta Independent (7 November 1999), Raphæl Vassallo quoted the University of Malta's Classics and Archæology Department's Professor Bonanno as saying:
    "Our existing temples have been very reliably carbon-dated to the period 3,600 to 2,500 B.C. In that space of time we have traced a regular evoltion in style, from the small and rudimentary to the large and complex. Even the earliest examples fall within that bracket of time, which strongly suggests that the temples of Malta originated from that period."
    If that quotation is accurate, Bonanno's use of "we" is interesting, since his own training and competency are in historical rather than in protohistorical or prehistoric archæology. Megaliths, moreover, cannot be, as he here so intriguingly suggests, "very reliably carbon-dated".
  • 2266. NATHANIEL CUTAJAR, "'Fat ladies' or immortal gods" in Malta - This Month, October 2002 (The in-flight magazine of Air Malta), front cover + pp. 14-16. Although the 19th-century drawing reproduced as figure 4 on page 15 may explain why it has been recently suggested that the lady or goddess modelled in the corresponding prehistoric statuette was "masturbating", no such inference is justified, the right hand in the actual statuette modestly reposes on the centre of her right thigh, her pudenda being, with equal modesty, openly displayed.
  • 2852. YVES NAUD, U.F.O.s and Extra-Terrestrials in History, volume 1 (Geneva: Éditions Ferni, 1978), pp. 48-9:
    "The archæological proof that the Ancients already used an alphabet in the Neolithic (second era of the Stone Age) was thought to have been found in France at the beginning of the 20th century.
    On March 1, 1924, Claude Fradin and his grandson, Émile, were taking a walk in the countryside around the tiny hamlet of Glozel, near Ferrière-sur-Sichon, in the Allier. Suddenly, strange objects attracted their attention: they were astounded by the discovery of bricks, engraved tablets, two cutting tools, two small hatchets, and two flat pebbles bearing inscriptions.
    And this was only the beginning. Dr Morlet, who lived in the region, was informed of the mysterious discovery. He had always been passionately interested in the strange, the unknown, the extraordinary, and he now followed up on the excavating work. This is how it came about that he unearthed more than one hundred tablets, tools of split stone, pottery of a type which has never been found elsewhere, and finally, engraved flat pebbles. Famous experts like Camille Jullian and Salomon Reinach dated these unique finds as having been made ten to fifteen thousand years ago. Some experts recognized, on certain objects, a linear disposition of characters resembling an alphabet, such as V W L H T I K O C J X.
    But the discovery of Glozel was soon to be sharply challenged by other experts, those of the International Institute of Anthropology and those of the French Identité judiciaire. They claimed fraud and concluded that the excavated objects were 'non-antique' [meaning, perhaps, no more than 'not originally discovered by one of their own number'?!]
    Apart from this questionable mastery of writing, which was challenged [at the time, but is now, in the light of Kurt Schildmann's recent findings, difficult reasonably to deny], it appears that certain ancient peoples possessed a vocabulary and a literature far more extensive than our own. The American Indians have a different name for the same plant or the same tree according to the season, whereas we simply indicate the change of a tree in the springtime to the same tree in the autumn by using an adjective…"

     

    To be continued…

             

    Home Page © The Neith Network Library 2005
    Webmaster: H.B. ExtraReverendDoctorColinJames Hamer, The Rainbow Programme
    Creativity House, 9 Oxford Street, St. Thomas, EXETER, Devon EX2 9AG, U.K.
    Updated 10:32 25/1/2005